I also do not put much stock in prophecy because they are so vague that it's not too hard to fulfill them, for example the entire book of Revelations. Or, right now I'm looking at The Half-Inch Prophecy by William Sears. The prophecy he's talking about is from the Bible. It reads, "In that day also he shall come even to thee from As-syr-i-a, and from the fortified cities, and from the fortress even to the river, and from sea to sea, and from mountain to mountain." So all you have to do is find a guy who has been to all of these places and you've fulfilled a prophecy. To explain the Assyria part, William Sears says, "Baha'u'llah's enforced journey took Him to Baghdad which was once in the ancient kingdom of Assyria." He didn't even come from there, he was just there for a little while. I have a problem with this type of truth investigation. You pick your conclusion and then you go looking for supporting evidence. That doesn't make much logical sense to me.
https://old.reddit.com/r/exbahai/comments/2esca7/regarding_baháulláhs_actions/ck3ht6b/
0 comentários:
Post a Comment