Karen Bacquet’s article, "Enemies
Within: Conflict and Control in the Baha’i Community," outlines
several criticisms focusing on the gap between the religion's progressive
public image and its internal administrative practices.
Here are some key points:
- Authoritarian Governing Structure: The Baha'i Faith is governed by an elected body, the
Universal House of Justice (UHJ), which is believed to be divinely
guided and infallible, making its decisions unchallengeable by
adherents.
- Lack of Institutional Accountability: Although the governing bodies are elected, they are not
held accountable to the electorate but are considered accountable only
to God.
- System of Censorship:
Adherents are subject to "prepublication review," a
policy where any Baha’i writing about the Faith for public consumption
must have their work approved by the administration.
- Fear of Internal Enemies: There is a pervasive fear of internal dissent that
might disrupt unity; those who challenge the administration are often
labeled "covenant-breakers" and described as
"spiritually sick".
- Practice of Shunning:
Individuals designated as covenant-breakers are subject to mandatory
shunning by the rest of the Baha'i community.
- Suppression of Dissent: The administration uses intimidation and
investigations by appointed officials (Auxiliary Board Members) to
monitor and silence members who express unorthodox views.
- Theocratic Ambitions:
The Baha'i administrative order is viewed not just as a church structure,
but as an evolving world theocracy that considers Western
democratic systems inferior and eventually doomed.
- Inequality in Governance: Despite teachings on gender equality, women are
excluded from serving on the supreme governing body, the Universal
House of Justice.
- Internet Crackdowns:
The leadership has threatened and sanctioned intellectuals for
expressing liberal opinions on private email forums and the Internet.
- Summary Expulsions:
In recent years, the administration has dropped critics from membership
rolls without prior warning or due process for expressing dissenting
views publicly.
- Hostility toward Modern Scholarship: The administration often condemns academic methods as "materialistic"
and interferes with scholarly projects sometimes by deleting
passages from primary sources.
- Pressure for Conformity: Adherents are placed in a psychological bind where
they are attracted by liberal ideals but pressured into absolute
obedience to an administrative system that does not tolerate public
disagreement.