'teaching' vs 'proselytism'

On page 174 [of Hatcher and Martin's book], the authors state that 'Despite the strong emphasis on teaching... proselytism is explicitly forbidden'. Whatever distinction may be made between the English terms 'teaching' and 'proselytism', original Baha'i texts generally use a single term that covers both concepts; tabligh. Baha'is engaged in the preaching of their faith are termed muballighun, while those who leave their homes as missionaries are muhajirun (a term with important Islamic connotations). To engage in tabligh is, literally, to convey information about one's faith by whatever means, with the aim of winning converts whenever and whereever possible. Even in English, the term 'convert' is used by Shoghi Effendi, and in practice the activities of Baha'i 'mass teaching' teams, which sometimes enrol hundreds of individuals in single 'mass conversions' (a term frequently used in modern Baha'i literature) is entirely consistent with anything implied by the English term 'proselytism'. If the authors are embarrassed by the proselytizing activities of their missionaries, surely it would have been better for them to have said so directly rather than trying to invent a prohibition which does not exist, except in the broad sense as a ban on the use of compulsion.

(Denis MacEoin (1987) Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441)

Read More

Haj and Ziyara (Pilgrimages) in the Baha'i faith

Errors stemming from a lack of familiarity with original source materials or ignorance of Islamic and Persian matters are not, of course, confined to issues relating to Islam as such. On page 180 [of Hatcher and Martin's book], for example, we are told that 'Baha'u'llah encouraged each of his followers to try, at least once during a lifetime, to undertake a nine-day pilgrimage to the World Centre of the Baha'i Faith in Haifa, Israel'. As in Islam, there are two types of 'pilgrimage' in Baha'ism: hajj and ziyara. The former, which corresponds to the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca, is, in Baha'ism, a rite undertaken by men only, either to the house of the Bab in Shiraz or that of Baha'u'llah in Baghdad. It is this pilgrimage which was ordained by Baha'u'llah. Ziyara is a much simpler 'visitation' to the shrines of saints. In the case of the Shrines of the Bab and Baha'u'llah in Haifa and at Bahji, near Acre, it was 'Abdul Baha who prescribed the pilgrimage. The nine-day period and the format of the current extended 'pilgrimage' (which actually involved much more than plain ziyara) were largely worked out by Shoghi Effendi and the present-day Baha'i administration. The 'Baha'i World Centre' did not, of course, exist at the time of Baha'u'llah.

(Denis MacEoin (1987) Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441)

Read More

The ignorance (?) of Baha'i scholars Hatcher and Martin about Islam

Let me turn to the book [of Hatcher and Martin] itself. The authors begin with a woefully short (5-page) examination of the 'Islamic background' to Baha'ism that fails utterly to do justice to the topic. This chapter touches inadequately and amateurishly on only one or two general aspects of Islam that have some bearing on the origins and systems either Babism or Baha'ism. There is no discussion of the concept of religious law (Shari'a) or any of its components, such as ritual prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, marriage, inheritance, or other aspects if socio-economic legislation. Shi'ism is treated largely as a millenarian movement, whose main function seems to have been to prepare for the advent of the Bab in 1844: there is no attempt to look closely at Shi'ite theories of prophethood and imamate (especially the use of the term mazhar ilahi), at the 'covenant' system of succession, or at concepts of cyclical time, all of which have an immense relevance to our subject. It would also have been extremely useful to have said at least a little about the development of Shi'ism in Iran, especially with regard to conditions in the nineteenth century. The result of all this is that, when certain topics such as prayer, pilgrimage, or the 'Baha'i covenant' are discussed later in the book, the reader is left with the false impression that these are wholly independent developments, where they are, in fact, extensions of standard Islamic theory and practice.

Generally speaking, the writers show either explicit ignorance of matters Islamic or give the impression that they are simply quite unaware of those many areas in which Baha'ism shares its world-view with Islam. Thus, for example, we are told that 'the early nineteenth century was a period of messianic expectation in the Islamic world as well as in the Christian world' (p.6); that the development of a covenant system of succession (wilaya) is 'the distinguishing feature of the Baha'i religion (p.50: it is, in fact, closely modelled on the Shi'ite imamate); that 'the Baha'i focus on achieving world unity and a world civilization... is both contemporary and unique' (p.132: in fact all of the basic themes involved occur in some form within Islam); that 'one of the teachings of its [the Baha'i Faith] founder.. is that God's greatest gift to humankind is reason' (p.xvi: this is a basic Islamic teaching).

(Denis MacEoin (1987) Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441)

Read More

Intellectually dishonest Baha'i scholars (loyal to the UHJ) try to avoid citing these scholars in their works.

Any study of the Baha'i faith claiming to incorporate 'the results of recent scholarship', should have at least some reference to studies and articles by Amanat, Berger, Smith, Johnson, Hampson, Bayat, Lambden, Garlington, Beveridge, Kahn, Bramson and MacEoin.

(Denis MacEoin (1987) A. Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441)

Read More

MacEoin's opinion about the book "The Baha'i Faith: The Emerging Global Religion" and its authors William S. Hatcher and J. Douglas Martin

According to its publishers, it is 'the first definitive introduction — sure to become a standard reference work — to the... Baha'i Faith'. It is, moreover, claimed as 'the most balanced and detailed examination of Baha'i belief to date'. Let me, then, begin my review by putting on record my firm opinion that this book is absolutely none of those things and that a balanced, serious, and informed study of the subject remains to be written.

The book is, in fact, nothing more than a straightforward work of Baha'i apologetics masquerading as an academic introduction.

Whatever it has now become, Baha'ism is a religion firmly rooted in Shi'ite Islam and in nineteenth-century Iranian culture, particularly during the most controversial phase of its origins within the Babi sect. Since all the scriptural and almost all the historical materials relating to the early period of the movement (up to the 1890s) are in Persian and Arabic (the bulk of them still in manuscript), it is hard to grasp how two Western writers, neither of whom is an Islamicist and neither of whom knows Persian or Arabic, could possibly hope to clarify to anyone's satisfaction 'many of the central textual and historical issues'. I wonder if they even know what most of the central textual and historical issues are. 

Denis MacEoin (1987) A. Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441

Read More

Baha'ism is the largest of the many new religious movements (NRMs) that have come to prominence since the Second World War

I do not think I am exaggerating if I suggest that Baha'ism is the largest of the many new religious movements that have come to prominence since the Second World War...

(Denis MacEoin (1987) A. Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208, DOI: 10.1080/13530198708705441)

Read More

Pros/Cons of Shoghi Effendi's leadership

Pros:

• He understood the direction society was going in the early 20th century, and predicted the moral decay of the West with surprising clarity for someone who died in 1957. Some of his writings on this (e.g. Signs of Moral Downfall and Isobel Sabri's Pilgrim's Notes) seemed almost prophetic.

• Remained true to the conservative aspects of the Baha'i Faith (as it relates to personal morality, chastity), in spite of any pressure there may have been from liberal converts of the time to compromise on these.

• Wrote some things limiting the sphere of the UHJ's powers (I guess it might have been in his interests to do this)

Cons:

• Held unreasonable grudges that were in the long term very bad for the Baha'i Faith. Used Baha'i Faith as a tool to retaliate against those he had grudges, and did his best to make it sting. Excommunicated his family members, and never forgave them, in spite of them apologizing and begging for decades to be let back in. Because of Shoghi Effendi none of Baha'u'llah's family is in the Baha'i Faith any more.

• Enforced unreasonable policies with respect to obedience to governments. Declared Baha'i refugees to be Covenant Breakers for not staying in Iran and getting martyred. Made Lidia Zamenhoff stay in Poland and get slaughtered in the Holocaust.

• Cultural purging of the Baha'i Faith. For example, I believe Shoghi Effendi was the first to ban Baha'is from having dual membership in both the Baha'i Faith and in Sufi Orders

Neutral:

• His roles as interpreter and translator is mixed. Some interpretations/translations were good and some were bad.

• He is the originator of this doctrine of Abdul Baha having a "special station" between a human and a manifestation but closer to a manifestation. This is a bad doctrine, but it didn't really change much since the Baha'is already pretty much viewed Abdul Baha as being a prophet or prophet-like. Who knows - this doctrine may have even been an effort by Shoghi Effendi to prevent Baha'is from viewing Abdul Baha as a prophet.

• Shoghi Effendi contributed to the bureaucratization of the Baha'i Faith, but I think he may be given a little to much blame. Most of the problems of the Baha'i administration are simply a result of over-centralization, and I think this is mostly Abdul Baha's fault for creating the institution of the UHJ. Institutions like the ITC and Regional Council were created directly by the UHJ, not Shoghi Effendi. Abdul Baha is also responsible for the Soviet-style Council Democracy hierarchy of the LSA, NSA, and UHJ.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FreeSpeechBahai/comments/wm9h24/proscons_of_shoghi_effendis_leadership/

Read More

Beloved Hand of the Cause of God Ugo Giachery on why the women are not eligible to the UHJ

"... why the women are not eligible to the House of Justice. You see, but the women who have the right, who are a member National Assembly, or the electors of the Universal House of Justice, and they don't have the duty of a member of the House of Justice. You will see how wonderful it would be with these little baby running around inside that the building of the Universal House of Justice just crying "mama, mama, mama" or something else. Now you can understand that. Bahá’u’lláh, in His wisdom, gave it to a woman an exemption from this honor [?] that he is to be a member of Universal House of Justice."

https://bahai.works/Transcript:Ugo_Giachery/Speaking_at_Scandinavian_Summer_School,_1974

Read More

Shaykhism is "something very close to a Shi'ite Sufi order".

His [Shaykh Ahmad's] essentially Sufi metaphysics and his emphasis on experiential religion, on dreams and visions and meditations, created space for popular involvement in the Shaykhi order - which became something very close to a Shi'ite Sufi order.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's mystical cosmology and Kabbalah

The close parallels between Shaykh Ahmad's mystical cosmology of the letters and the gematria of the Kabbalah is striking. Moses Cordovera of the sixteenth-century Safed school in Ottoman Palestine saw the Pentateuch or Torah as made up of divine letters, themselves manifestations of the divine light, which go on to form the names of God and ultimately worlds and worldly beings, as the letters undergo a "fall" or materialization. The gnostic motif of the material universe as "fallen" or evil is missing in Shaykhism, though gross matter is seen as inferior to subtle spirituality. But similarities between the two movements clearly exist, and they derive in part from a common Mediterranean heritage of ancient Jewish conceptions, Neoplatonism, and Gnosticism, which percolated into the Shi'ism of the eighth century and into medieval Judaism. The possibility that Muslim mystics and Kabbalists in places such as Muslim Spain, Isma'ili Yemen, and Ottoman Palestine influenced one another also cannot be dismissed. Beyond such a shared legacy of ideas, Kabbalism and Shaykhism developed some of their resemblance because the masters of both employed a similar spiritual logic in reworking this heritage.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's attitude towards Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra

The radical aspect of Shaykh Ahmad's thought is apparent in its revisionism and its dynamism. On the one hand, he clearly was motivated by what Harold Bloom called the "anxiety of influence", the desire of creative thinkers to somehow escape the conceptual and literary structures erected by their forebears where these are perceived as limiting. Shaykh Ahmad's acceptance of much in Ibn 'Arabi's metaphysics while sharply criticizing the Andalusian Sufi himself, and his love-hate relationship with previous Shi'ite theosophers such as Mulla Sadra and Mulla Muhsin Fayz Kashani demonstrate this anxiety no less than do his doctrinal innovativeness and his idiosyncratic scripture commentary.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's cosmology

Shaykh Ahmad creates his poetic and imaginative cosmology by juxtaposing the idea that the world is like an organism with the notion that the world resembles a language. Like an organism, it develops over time, growing from a simple seed into an ever more complex being, putting out ramifying branches. Like a language, it is a system made up of a finite number of discrete units that are combined and recombined according to regular laws.

By appealing to both symbols in the same treatise, indeed, Shaykh Ahmad powerfully transcends the dichotomy between nature and culture. If the natural world is spelled out by primal, divine letters, then nature is cultural. If humans are microcosms of the world-tree's leaf, then culture is natural. Nature is cultural insofar as it, like an orthographic system, "makes sense", and letter symbolism thus acts powerfully to reject an understanding of the universe as random and meaningless. It was argued by the great anthropologist, Claude Levi-Strauss, that myths in primitive culture were often about the transition from nature to culture, and that the contradiction between the two was expressed symbolically, so that nature is represented by fresh food that spoils whereas in culture raw food is cooked. In contrast, Shaykh Ahmad's cosmologies, the product of a highly sophisticated and literate intellectual tradition, deny the nature/culture contradiction by challenging the validity of this binary opposition and showing how each of these opposing concepts demonstrates characteristics of the other. The identification of the microcosm, the human soul, with the macrocosm of the primal leaf even undermines the distinction between the self and the world. In transcending these contradictions, Shaykh Ahmad forcefully underscores the sacredness of the universe, which reflects in its orthographic and organic meaningfulness the creative design of the divine Mind.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad about the creation of Mohammed and his other myths

Shaykh Ahmad in his mystical and theological anthology quotes a passage from "one of the learned", about how God created the Tree of Certainty (shajarat al-yaqin), from which he in turn made the light of Muhammad bloom from one of its branches in the shape of a peacock, which praised God for seventy thousand years. After this time, God created a mirror in which it could see itself, and the cosmic peacock then bowed to God five times, thus originating the five daily prayers of Islam. God created from the light of Muhammad the spirits of the believers, and their station in life was determined by which part of the Prophet's body of light they first saw upon coming to consciousness. The origins of this cosmological myth may plausibly be seen to lie in ancient Iranian mythology, with the Saena tree as the Tree of Certainty, the Saena bird or Simurgh as the peacock, and the five Zoroastrian daily prayers as the bird's five prostrations.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad was influenced by mythologies

The other symbol to which Shaykh Ahmad appeals in this treatise is more obviously a "cosmic reality", a natural phenomenon that, as Ricoeur has said, both manifests and signifies higher realities. The world-tree, a powerful mythological image in many cultures, has especial resonances for mystics in the world religions, for it immediately suggests the spanning of earth and sky; more, it speaks of development, of the growth of a towering complex being from a tiny kernel. The Indo-European root deru is the origin of both the English word "tree" and the word "true". "Druid", the name for holy men in Celtic Europe, means the "knower of the tree (or the true)" (deru-wid). In ancient Iranian mythology, preserved in Zoroastrian texts, the Saena tree that stood in the midst of the cosmic Lake Vourukasha was said to be the source of all seeds. In this fabulous Tree of Healing (vispobish) nested the Saena bird, with the head of a dog and the body of a fowl, which from time to time flapped its enormous wings, sending the multifarious seeds of the Saena tree flying over the earth, upon which they landed and from which they grew into the vegetation that covered it. In Islamic mysticism, many elements of this myth were taken over. The Saena bird, for instance, became for Suhrawardi and Faridu'd-Din 'Attar (d. ca. 1230) the "Simurgh" (a contraction of Saena meregh), and they see it as symbol of the soul's mystical unity with God. It is said that its haunt is the mystical mountain of Qaf (a transformation of an Iranian mythic geographical symbol) beyond the world-sea (i.e. Vourukasha). Kazem Tehrani has pointed out that for Suhrawardi, the tree of all seeds is associated with a return of the soul to the "first form" (shakl-i avval), identified with the nest of the Simurgh, a conception that differs slightly from 'Attar's notion of the mythical bird as a mirror in which the soul sees itself. The Iranian idea of the Saena tree was probably mediated to Shaykh Ahmad through writings of such Iranian mystics, and it has for him, as well, connotations of the soul's return to its primal, pure estate.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's belief about the creation of the universe.

The plane of the Universal Intellect, the first emanation from the divine Will, is also called the One (wahid), since it is on this plane that number and specification first appear. On this plane God pronounces nineteen letters, creating the lower nineteen levels of existence: the nine spheres, the four elements, the three kingdoms of nature, man, jinn, and angels. The nineteen letters form the words, bism Allah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim, "In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate", whereby the chapters of the Qur'an begin. This phrase is the universal manifestation of all the levels of contingent being, and for that very reason consists of nineteen letters. When the numerical value of the One (wahid) is added to numerical value of the higher divine plane of Unicity (ahad), the results is equivalent to the letters forming the name kaf, corresponding to the Roman K. The letter kaf, in turn, stands for the Divine Will. It is also the first letter of the Arabic phrase "Be !" (kun) whereby God created the universe. This kaf revolves, and from it emanate all things. A similar discussion occurs in the important treatise of Ibn 'Arabi, The Tree of Being (Shajarat al-Kawn).

...The poetic and dream-like quality of letters as constitutive of the world is immediately apparent, but as cultural constructs they would appear to fail Ricceur's test for the authentic symbol insofar as they lack a cosmic dimension. It is here that the old Greek practice of calling both the elements (earth, air, fire and water) and the letters of the alphabet stoicheia becomes important. For Shaykh Ahmad, as well, the letters are elements, so that letter mysticism in this Greco-Arabic tradition is not only cosmological linguistics but also atomistic physics, and a natural, "cosmic" dimension to the alphabet as symbol can therefore also be discerned.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad, Akhbarism and a commentary on a tradition attributed to the Prophet of Islam.

Shaykh Ahmad's short treatise on cosmological symbolism was penned in response to an inquiry from Mirza Muhammad 'Ali Mudarris* (d. 1825) of Yazd, who desired a commentary on a saying attributed to the Prophet : "God wrote a Text (kitabah) two thousand years before He created the universe, on a myrtle leaf that He caused to grow. He placed it upon the Throne, then called out : 'O community of Muhammad - peace be upon him and his House - My compassion transcends My wrath. I have given to you before you even asked, and forgiven you before you sought forgiveness. Whoso among you bears witness that there is no God but Me, and that Muhammad is My servant and messenger, I shall usher him into paradise by reason of my compassion".

*Mudarris was a prominent cleric of the strict constructionist or Akhbari school of jurisprudence in Yazd.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's approach towards Sufi mysticism and Shi'ite gnosis. He was much influenced by Ibn Abi Jumhur al-Ahsa'i

He [Shaykh Ahmad] innovated within, quarrelled with, and pushed to its limits the highly sophisticated heritage of Sufi mysticism and Shi'ite gnosis ('irfan) that had crystallized in the seventeenth-century School of Isfahan. In addition, Shaykh Ahmad tapped into a little-known stream of indigenous Eastern Arabian thought.* His use of symbolic language captured the imagination of tens of thousands in the Arab East, Iran, and India, and the controversial, mystical Shaykhi order came to be established in his name, largely after his death. Out of this matrix later developed the messianic Babi movement and the Baha'i faith, a new world religion, suggesting that al-Ahsa'i's ideas, while they could be taken in a conservative direction as occurred among Kerman Shaykhis, also contained radical potentialities.

*I now have ample textual proof that Shaykh Ahmad is much influenced by theosopher Ibn Abi Jumhur al-Ahsa'i (b. 1434) and the great Bahraini thinkers of the Safarid period (1501-1722); see : Juan R.I. Cole, "Rival Empires of Trade and Imami Shi'ism in Eastern Arabia, 1300-1800", International Journal of Middle East Studies 19 (1987): 177-204.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Shaykh Ahmad's started to claim when it was a bad time for the Shias

He [Shaykh Ahmad] came to "consciousness" at a tragic time for Shi'ite Islam, which was battered in the eighteenth century by the Sunni Afghan invasion of Shi'ite Iran and dethronement of Shi'ism as the state religion, by the anti-Shi'ite Wahhabi tribes of Arabia, and by growing Russian and British power.

(Juan R. I. Cole, The World as Text: Cosmologies of Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsa'i, Studia Islamica No. 80 (1994), pp. 145-163 Published By Brill)

Read More

Promoting the Baha'i faith in Iran in a semi-clandestine manner.

Nasir al-Din Shah’s successor, Muzaffar al-Din Shah, had a more favourable attitude towards Baha’is. They were able to publish semi-clandestinely through alternative print technologies, such as the lithograph and jellygraph, that proved difficult to regulate.

Baha’is were also active in the early history of Iranian newspapers where, so long as they made no explicit reference to their religious affiliation, they could thrive and prosper. Mirza Mahmud Khan was the editor of the late nineteenth century Isfahan-based newspaper Farhang, a copy of which was regularly sent to ‘Abdu’l-Baha in ‘Akka. Sayyid Faraj Allah Kashani edited the newspaper Surayya in Egypt, Tihran, and Kashan during the 1903–1910 period. With the outbreak of the Constitutional Revolution in 1906, Baha’is continued to play a part in publishing newspapers. In the capital Tehran, Sayyid Ahmad Khavari Kashani published the newspaper Mizan. During these years, the Baha’i female activist Ta’irah published a series of articles in the leftist newspaper Iran-i Naw. Another Baha’i, Muhammad ‘Ali Hidayat, established his own press, Matba‘ah-i Khurasan, and published two newspapers: Bisharat and the constitutional-era Tus.

In the capital Tehran, the Imperial Press (Matba‘ah-i Shahi) sometimes employed Baha’is where they engaged in clandestine Baha’i publishing. Mirza ‘Ali Akbar Rawhani Milani Muhibb al-Sultan was a case in point. Muhibb al-Sultan lived in Central Asia for several years, including in Bukhara and Samarqand, before making a pilgrimage to ‘Akka in 1895 to 1896. He stayed there for six months, copying Baha’i texts, before returning to Ashkabad. Two years later, he once again made pilgrimage to ‘Akka, copied Baha’i texts, but this time he travelled and settled in Iran. Reaching Tehran in 1898/1899 he worked for the Imperial Press. Two Baha’is close to Muzaffar al-Din Shah — Ahmad Khan Sani‘ al-Saltanah and his son Mirza Ibrahim ‘Akkasbashi — had established the press thereby providing Muhibb al-Sultan crucial access to print technology. In addition to his involvement with the Imperial Press, ‘Akkasbashi was Muzaffar al-Din Shah’s court photographer and the first Iranian to record a motion picture. Muhibb al-Sultan was appointed the director and editor of the Imperial Press. In his spare time, he published a great number of Baha’i publications through jellygraph (tab‘-i ‘aksi) in his own handwriting. The fall of the Qajar dynasty and the rise of Riza Shah provided Muhibb al-Sultan the opportunity to use type-set printing for Baha’i Persian publications in Iran for the first time. The life of Muhibb al-Sultan in some ways parallels that of Mirza Mahdi Gulpayigani. Like Mirza Mahdi, he travelled extensively through Central Asia, Iran, and made pilgrimage to Palestine. Both men benefited greatly from being involved in government print operations and utilized their expertise to produce Baha’i publications.

Through the efforts of Muhibb al-Sultan’s clandestine press, the popular Baha’i poet Na‘im was able to publish his apologetic works meant to assist Baha’is in their propagation efforts. ‘Abdu’l-Baha even commissioned the translation of an English apologetic work into Persian with the intention of having it published by Muhibb al-Sultan for the Iranian community.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

Abdul Baha censored the book

In the immediate aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, Baha’is increasingly confronted secular modes of thought. As was the case in India, publishing and public debates often went hand-in-hand. In 1919 to 1920, Sayyid Mahdi entered into a public debate with communists on a range of economic and religious issues resulting in the publication of a treatise on socialism and the Baha’i Faith. Sayyid Mahdi’s engagement with secular modes of thinking included Kashf al-Ghita, a posthumous expanded version of his uncle’s refutation of the British scholar E. G. Browne’s works on the Baha’i Faith. ‘Abdu’l-Baha censored the book for its overly polemical tone, once again demonstrating his active monitoring of printed Baha’i books.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

How Baha'is invaded the Bans?

In 1917, ‘Abdu’l-Baha appointed an association (anjuman) to run the operations of the press and to establish a Baha’i magazine, Khurshid-i Kavar. Mirza Mahdi [Gulpayigani] drew on his previous printing expertise to publish the magazine, using it in part to respond to what Mashhad newspapers would write about the Baha’i Faith. Since the magazine was blocked from being imported into Iran from Khurasan, it was often brought to Gilan — a province in which Baha’is were in charge of customs duties — and circulated from there.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

Gulpaygani made his livelihood as the editor of the Russian imperial government’s Persian magazine

It was only twenty years later, in the aftermath of the Russian revolution in 1917, that Mirza Abu al-Fazl’s vision for a Baha’i magazine was realized through the efforts of his nephew, Sayyid Mahdi Gulpayigani. Sayyid Mahdi made his livelihood as the editor of the Russian imperial government’s Persian magazine, Majmu‘ah-i Mavara-yi Bahr-i Khizir.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

In 1920, Muslims and Zoroastrians allied themselves with local Parsis in debating Baha’is.

By the 1920s, the itinerant Baha’i teacher, Mirza Munir Nabilzadah, was at the centre of a number of Iranian propagation efforts in India. As if directly responding to ‘Abdu’l-Baha’s call for the prioritization of oral engagement over the mere textual circulation of scripture, Nabilzadah’s publications were usually the direct outcome of face-to-face encounters. Sometime in the mid-1920s, he published an advertisement in three Bombay newspapers inviting people to a dialogue on the Baha’i Faith. Local journalists covered the ensuing debate between Nabilzadah and his Shi‘i and Zoroastrian interlocutors.

In response, an Iranian Muslim ‘Abd al-Husayn Sipanta and an Iranain Zoroastrian Shah Bahram [Shahrukh], allied themselves with local Parsis in debating Baha’is. They organized a conference at the Zoroastrian Fire Temple (atashkadah) in Bombay aimed at refuting Baha’i messianic claims to being the fulfillment of the Zoroastrian tradition. They enlisted the expertise of the famous Iranian Muslim Iranologist and scholar of Zoroastrianism, Ibrahim Purdavud. A series of articles questioning the validity of the Baha’i claim that Baha’u’llah was the promised Zoroastrian messiah Sayoshant were published in the Indian newspaper Jam. Nabilzadah described his response to these articles as “teeth-shattering” (dandan-shikan) and as leaving his opponents silenced.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

Abdul Baha's policy of vetting Baha’i texts prior to publication

‘Abdu’l-Baha’s policy of vetting Baha’i texts prior to publication should be understood against the backdrop of these divided loyalties. While he recognized the potential for print in propagating the Baha’i message, he also realized it could be used to back contesting claims to authority.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

With the death of Baha’u’llah, Nasiri press was closed down.

Mirza Ibrahim Afnan, a Shirazi merchant residing in Bombay, established the Nasiri press, the first Baha’i press of its kind. Two early publications of the Nasiri press included Baha’u’llah’s Kitab-i Iqan, an apologetic work defending the claims of the Bab, and ‘Abdu’l-Baha’s political reformist text Risalah-i Madaniyah. Both texts had a Muslim audience in mind and made no explicit reference to their authors’ identity. The overwhelming majority of publications were devotional works, including collections of prayers and other scriptures for the consumption of the Baha’i community.

Calligraphers and scribes acted as cultural brokers mediating between the Baha’i leadership located in Palestine and the Nasiri press in India. Since lithography could faithfully reproduce hand-written text, calligraphers and scribes were significant agents in the early history of Baha’i publishing. Baha’u’llah and ‘Abdu’l-Baha dispatched a number of calligraphers and scribes to Bombay, including Mishkin Qalam, Muhammad Husayn Khurtumi, and Jamal al-Din Effendi, in order to engage in a range of tasks related to publishing, varying from delivering manuscripts for publication to preparing lithographed texts. These texts found their way to Iran often through the efforts of these same middlemen. For instance, the itinerant Baha’i scholar Mirza Abu al-Fazl disseminated nineteen lithographed copies of the Bombay Kitab-i Iqan during a trip to Tabriz.

By the mid-1890s, the Nasiri press was at the center of both financial and religious controversy. Presses in India, whether publishing in Persian, Urdu, or Hindi, were rarely successful commercial ventures despite a large potential readership domestically and, in the case of Persian, abroad in Iran and Central Asia. This was especially the case with a Baha’i press whose potential readership was sparse and geographically dispersed. With the death of Baha’u’llah in 1892, the Nasiri press found itself embroiled in the ensuing controversy over succession between ‘Abdu’l-Baha and his half-brother, Mirza Muhammad ‘Ali.

(Farzin Vejdani, Transnational Baha’i Print Culture: Community Formation and Religious Authority, 1890–1921, Journal of Religious History, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2012)

Read More

the Baha'i divorce rate in the United States was above the national average

Typical of the book's uncritical idealizing are the references (pp.158-59, 164, 203) to Baha'i marriage and family life. We are told, for example, that 'the institution of marriage must be restored to its position as the foundation on which civilization can flourish' and that 'the public will be watching to see whether... Baha'i marriages and family life represent a new beginning: whether the teachings of Baha'u'llah give hope that the general trend toward the disintegration of this basic social building block can be reversed' (p.203). What we are not told is that, some years ago at least, the Baha'i divorce rate in the United States was above the national average; or, for that matter, that Baha'i law permits a man to marry two wives (the current ruling that requires monogamy is an administrative, not a spiritual obligation, according to Shoghi Effendi), Or that another law allows a husband to repudiate his wife unilaterally if, on consummation of the marriage, he discovers her not to be a virgin.

(Denis MacEoin (1987) Article, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 13:2, 193-208)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13530198708705441

Read More

If a person is registered as a member of a church or similar religious organization he should withdraw from it on becoming a Bahá’í.

If a person is registered as a member of a church or similar religious organization he should withdraw from it on becoming a Bahá’í.

In the case of new believers, it should be made clear to them in the course of teaching them the Faith that one cannot be a Bahá’í and also a member of another religious organization. This is simply a matter of straight-forwardness and honesty. A great part of the teaching of Jesus Christ concerned His Second Coming and the preparation of His followers to be ready for it. The Bahá’ís believe He has come. No Christian Church believes this; on the contrary, they either look for Him still, or have ceased to believe that He will come. For a Bahá’í to be a member of a community which holds such beliefs is disloyalty to Christ and hypocrisy towards the Christians.

You should not formalize the method by which the withdrawal from the church is to be made, and certainly nothing should be added to a declaration form, if you use one. It should be left to the Local Spiritual Assembly which is accepting the declaration to satisfy itself, as it deems best in each case, that the new believer has already resigned from the church, or does so within a reasonable time of his declaration.

In regard to the old believers, your Assembly should tactfully, and in a kindly way, make the Bahá’í position clear to them and gently persuade them to resign from their former churches. This is a matter for great tact and discretion. If such a believer remains adamant you will have to consider depriving him of his voting rights.

Lights of Guidance by Helen Hornby

https://bahai.works/Lights_of_Guidance/Churches

Read More

The doctrine of metempsychosis upheld by the Hindus is fallacious.

'The Bahá'í view of 'reincarnation' is essentially different from the Hindu conception. The Bahá'ís believe in the return of the attributes and qualities, but maintain that the essence or the reality of things cannot be made to return. Every being keeps its own individuality, but some of his qualities can be transmitted. The doctrine of metempsychosis upheld by the Hindus is fallacious.'

(To an individual believer, March 27, 1938)

https://bahai-library.com/hornby_lights_guidance_2.html&chapter=4#n1820

Read More

We believe that what Bahá'u'lláh has revealed and Abdu'l-Bahá has written is from God

'We as Bahá'ís are not influenced by the categorical assertions of scholars. We believe that what Bahá'u'lláh has revealed and Abdu'l-Bahá has written is from God, and divinely inspired; that Bahá'u'lláh is a Manifestation of God, and has access to a knowledge denied to ordinary human beings.'

(Letter written to an individual believer, April 22, 1954 on behalf of the Guardian)

Read More