The book contains nothing that might reasonably be called an argument. Instead names of God and invocations are endlessly repeated

The book contains nothing that might reasonably be called an argument. Instead names of God and invocations are endlessly repeated and varied, often in ways unsanctioned by Arabic usage. Syntax is nearly as idiosyncratic. Thus, for example, the first page has Allah used as a superlative in the form a'lah, an infinitive ilhn, participles mu'talih, mu'lah, and so on. To the extent that the book has content, it is not in the form of an extended argument but in enraptured rhapsodies about particular themes. Thus the sermon on the first day rhapsodizes about the first day of Baha—Naw-Ruz—as the "day of God," the name given it by the Bab in the Bayan. In such respects it is similar to the Kitabu'l-Asma', written sometime earlier and also arranged on a calendrical basis.

https://bahai-library.com/walbridge_kitab_panj-shan_commentary